Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

RADIASI fokus pada hasil-hasil penelitian dan kajian ilmiah khususnya dalam bidang Pendidikan Fisika. Dalam hal mana dimungkinkan merupakan hasil kajian non pendidikan sejauh dapat diterapkan dalam pembelajaran Fisika.

RADIASI mencakup:

1. Pembelajaran Fisika: model dan metode pembelajaran

2. Pengembangan media dan bahan ajar untuk pembelajaran Fisika

3. Eksperimen fisika yang dapat diterapkan dalam pembelajaran Fisika

4. ICT dalam pembelajaran Fisika

5. Assesmen pembelajaran Fisika

6. Konsep dan Miskonsepsi dalam Fisika

7. Pemanfaatan potensi kearifan lokal dalam pembelajaran FIsika

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Semua naskah/ artikel yang telah disubmit akan diseleksi, dibaca, dan direview secara tertutup oleh dua orang reviewer yang ahli dalam bidangnya. Naskah yang terpilih tergantung pada kesahihan, orisinalitas, kejelasan, dan sesuai dengan scope jurnal.Manuscript can be accepted without revision, accepted with minor revision, accepted with major revision, or rejected. Reviews result will be emailed to author and given 3 weeks to send the revised manuscript.

Guna mencegah plagiarisme, semua naskah harus dicek tingkat kemiripannya menggunakan software anti plagiarisme.

 

Publication Frequency

RADIASI: Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika publish 2 (dua) kali dalam setahun yaitu bulan September dan April .

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher, namely Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo. In general, the publication ethics of the Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA) refers to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) about Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editor.

Section A: Publication and authorship

  1. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review process are double blind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication.


Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process.
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.


Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.


Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.



Web
Analytics

Jumlah Kunjungan

TERINDEKS :

 

Erlenmeyer Erlenmeyer Erlenmeyer Erlenmeyer

 

e - ISSN: 2549 - 0826

Penerbit:
Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo
Jl. KHA. Dahlan 3 Purworejo, Jawa Tengah, 54111
email: jurnalradiasi@gmail.com